Nancy Pelosi, Liar

And she has provoked the CIA to boot. Charles Krauthammer on Fox's Special Report today on the Speaker's unbelievable claims on what she knew and when she knew it:

"Her news conference today was an utter disaster. She was nervous, she was shifty, her syntax was incomprehensible, and there were times that she had to refer to her original statement because she couldn't remember what her current truth was. It reminds me of a line in a Graham Greene novel, in which a spy says I prefer to tell the truth, it's easier to memorize. Well she didn't have it memorized. You have a sense that if you had attached a lie detector to her in that newser it would have short circuited. Her problem was this: She was internally contradictory, with one point within thirty seconds, she contradicted her own statement on what she had heard and done from her staffer in February '03. She was contradicted by the evidence of others like Porter Goss. Her charge of the CIA lying to her is utterly implausible. Why would it lie to her and tell all the others the truth? It makes no sense at all. And it was refuted by the black and white Obama CIA memo...not a memo out of the prince of darkness Bush and Cheney, but Obama's CIA...she is now at war with the CIA, which through selective leaking can destroy her, and I suspect they will."

Obama and The Rule of Law

WSJ:

The Obama administration's behavior in the Chrysler bankruptcy is a profound challenge to the rule of law. Secured creditors -- entitled to first priority payment under the "absolute priority rule" -- have been browbeaten by an American president into accepting only 30 cents on the dollar of their claims. Meanwhile, the United Auto Workers union, holding junior creditor claims, will get about 50 cents on the dollar....

By stepping over the bright line between the rule of law and the arbitrary behavior of men, President Obama may have created a thousand new failing businesses. That is, businesses that might have received financing before but that now will not, since lenders face the potential of future government confiscation. In other words, Mr. Obama may have helped save the jobs of thousands of union workers whose dues, in part, engineered his election. But what about the untold number of job losses in the future caused by trampling the sanctity of contracts today?

ObamaCare and Your Physician

Scott Gottlieb:

The 60% of doctors who are self-employed will be hardest hit. That includes specialists, such as dermatologists and surgeons, who see a lot of private patients. But it also includes tens of thousands of primary-care doctors, the very physicians the Obama administration says need the most help.

Doctors will consolidate into larger practices to spread overhead costs, and they'll cram more patients into tight schedules to make up in volume what's lost in margin. Visits will be shortened and new appointments harder to secure. It already takes on average 18 days to get an initial appointment with an internist, according to the American Medical Association, and as many as 30 days for specialists like obstetricians and neurologists.

Right or wrong, more doctors will close their practices to new patients, especially patients carrying lower paying insurance such as Medicaid. Some doctors will opt out of the system entirely, going "cash only." If too many doctors take this route the government could step in -- as in Canada, for example -- to effectively outlaw private-only medical practice.

The New Lie Detector

It's the amount of detail, or lack of it, that may help police officers in some instances tell if a person is lying to them.

Olbermann Critical of Sykes

Now Wanda, when even Keith Olbermann says that you've gone over the line, you really ought to step back, take a deep breath, and take measure of yourself.

Specter Not Feeling The Love

All is not as Arlen Specter had hoped for in terms of his relationship with Pennsylvania Democrats.

Savage

Excluded from the UK as a distraction? Maybe so:

To exclude someone from entering this country is a serious act of state. We have not been told how the decision was taken. We do not know which criteria were applied.

All we can say for certain is that there was no attempt to consult our elected representatives in the House of Commons, engrossed as they now are in defending their expenses, and it looks very much as though the list of banned persons was rushed out to cover up the hoo-ha over the Home Secretary's taxpayer-funded bath plug.

Michael Savage has said ignorant and unpleasant things about gay people, autism and Muslims. But it is far from clear that he would be in breach of any law, even in this country. The world is full of loudmouth media berks with views that we would all like to keep to themselves, but we can't ban them all from entering Britain.